May 16, 2006
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
United States Supreme Court Rules in DaimlerChrysler v. Cuno.
Overview
The U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously ruled in DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno
and Wilkins v. Cuno that the Cuno plaintiffs, who challenged the constitutionality
of Ohio's investment tax credit (“ITC”), lacked standing to bring their suit
in the federal courts. The Supreme Court vacated the
portion of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Cuno that invalidated the
ITC, remanding the cases to the lower court for dismissal.
The cases concerned whether two incentives used to induce DaimlerChrysler to
locate a new auto plant in Toledo, Ohio, near an existing plant violated the
Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The incentives at issue
were a local property tax abatement and the ITC. The trial court upheld the
constitutionality of both incentives and the plaintiffs appealed to the Court
of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which upheld the property tax abatement
program but struck down the ITC. Both parties appealed to the United
States Supreme Court (“Supreme Court”), which agreed to hear
DaimlerChrysler’s challenge to the Sixth Circuit’s invalidation of the
ITC. The plaintiffs’ appeal, with respect to the property tax abatement, is
still pending, and the Supreme Court has not ruled on whether it would hear
the case.
The Supreme Court’s decision vacates the trial court and Court of Appeals
decisions, meaning that the cases have no status as precedent. The
plaintiffs can now, if they so choose, refile their case in the Ohio
state courts, which do not apply the same standing requirements as the
federal courts. The uncertainty engendered by the Supreme Court’s
resolution of the cases may cause the Congress to assert its Commerce
Clause power to allow the states to utilize incentives like the ITC.
In particular, the Economic Development Act of 2005, which would authorize
incentives such as the ITC, was introduced in the House and the Senate in
May of 2005. H.R. 2471 (2005) and S. 1066 (2005). Congress delayed
consideration of these bills when the Supreme Court agreed to hear the
case and may now revisit the issue.
If you have any questions regarding the above information, please contact Ms.
Helen Lemmon, Principal in Charge of Ryan & Company National Credits & Incentives
Practice, at 412.535.4400, or Mr. Robert Maida, Senior Manager of the Ryan & Company
Pittsburgh Office, at 412.535.4400. Ms. Lemmon and
Mr. Maida can also be reached
via email.
<< Back to Tax Developments